Bible prophecies that came true are abundant. The prophecy about Babylons fall in one night, and the name of the person who would lead the charge to fell it - Cyrus. The prophecy of Cyrus has been verified as having been written long before his birth as well. You could argue that the name Cyrus was only used AFTER his taking down Babylon - but even that wouldn't change the means of Babylons defeat being prophesied and actually succeeding. To imagine that the Babylons of the time weren't aware of the prophecy is foolish, so even with knowledge of the prophecy against them they still were brought down by it.
The prophecies about Jesus were all fullfilled by his own chosen actions, true. But the sheer number of them make it improbable that he'd be able to do it, let alone the fact that free will was always a variable - what if they actually acceptd Jesus and didn't put him to death? That absolutely was a possibility because God has never and will never take away a persons freedom of choice.
The flood is a questionable one I suppose, but when you factor in that every culture in humanity has a legend about a global flood it makes it far less improbable. Why would such a story span across cultures that were even separated by the oceans? Even the religions of old were built around the flood, the tradition of the easter egg comes from the Egyption story that a Goddess was preserved in an egg upon the sea, the traditions involving halloween are tied to the celebrated remembrance of the people who the flood destroyed. The fact that even the ancient pagan cultures held within them the FACT of the flood (in their minds), though from a different opinion of it being a vile evil thing, gives credence to the flood itself.
The fall of Jerusalem by Rome was foretold, and only those who listened to Christ's direction to, "Flee to the mountains" survived.
Finally, just as a general point of support for the authenticity of Jesus. Josephus was alive, and saw him in action. I know the watchtower has said this, but I've read Josephus and researched this for myself. He did in fact speak of Jesus and his brother James, the fact that he was called the Christ and the facts of how he was viewed by the men we see in the Bible as hating him. He gives credence to these things because he saw them, he also wrote of, "startling deeds" jesus was able to perform, though that passage is of course a point of contention as to whether ot not it's authentic. Regardless of that last bit, he wrote of a man who did indeed live. And his very life is a prophesided existance - his being born being something he has no control over accomplishing anymore than his bloodline through which he came (also prophesied).
Further, Daniel had his vision in which he saw the beasts which the angel then identified for him as certain world powers by name - this all came true, even down to the fine details of Alexander dying early and his kingdom being split in four.
There are numerous Bible prophecies that came true.
Havign said all that I would also say that the point of the Bible was always and has always been to teach us how to live together in peace and unity. Love was the whole point of the law and the prophets, love was the example Jesus left to follow all the while chastising the desciples for their arguing about, "who is the best among them." Yet, we all still argue about who is the best, be it the best religion, the best intelligence, the best knowledge, etc. Whether prophecy came true or not isn't the point of the writtings, and the point is entirely lost in it's debate.
